Mobile Vouchers – The Next Billion Dollar Market?
by Russell Buckley on 11. May, 2011 in Mobile coupons, Mobile Phone Evolution, Personal
You may have read in the news over last few weeks that I’ve taken the decision to return to a full time role in the mobile marketing scene, as Chief Marketing Officer of Eagle Eye Solutions in the UK. I thought I’d take the opportunity here to explain my thinking a little and why I believe this is where the action is going to be in the next few years.
Firstly, let me clarify one brief point. When I wrote about my plans a month ago I suggested that I would be looking at some advisory work, investing and mentoring. This is something I’m still doing and plan to continue, so taking a full time gig is not a u-turn in any way, but very much complementary to the work I’ll be doing at Eagle Eye. You’ll still hopefully see me on the speaking circuit and I’m especially looking forward to the MLOVE Confestival taking place in a castle near Berlin at the end of June. I’ll be expanding on some of my recent talks about the exponential growth of mobile technology, The Singularity and the short and long term implications for businesses. And there’s a bunch of great speakers and plenty of partying to look forward to – check it out and book your place.
Anyway, back to mobile vouchers.
When I were a lad starting out in marketing, we used to bandy around the phrase “Advertising loads the gun and Sales Promotion pulls the trigger”. Like many truisms, it contained a healthy dollop of fact and wisdom, even if it was simplistically expressed. Basically, it suggested that Advertising’s job was to build a brand and create consumer demand for the product. And Sales Promotion created the sale by, for example, driving store traffic, promoting the product in-store or running loyalty programmes.
Today, Sales Promotion has been officially abolished in favour of “Promotional Marketing”, but broadly speaking, the principles are the same.
However, the hybrid “performance marketing” has also grown disproportionately important, where the ad also stimulates a purchase – largely driven by PC-based display and search marketing. This is a very effective technique for advertisers and can often be purchased on a payment-by-results basis – you only pay when the consumer engages with the brand by clicking on the ad (Pay Per Click), or in some cases, actually making a purchase of the product (known as CPA or Cost Per Action).
Digital Direct Response Advertising or Performance Advertising has proved truly revolutionary, but really only for companies who can complete an action or make a sale online. So if you’re say, Amazon, eBay or LastMinute.com, Performance Advertising is marketing nirvana. But if you still rely on a purchase of a physical product in a real-world store, the case is less clear. If online activity simply drives consumers to your website which doesn’t actually stimulate a transaction, does this have real value?
Rather than getting into a debate about the merits of this argument, let’s just look at the facts.
According to eMarketer, online ad spend now accounts for 15.4% of the total. There’s an argument to suggest that this is low anyway in comparison to how much time the average person spends online, as opposed to engaged with other media. Despite this, Nielsen states that
Big FMCG brands in particular might appear to have been rather shy of the online space, with Procter & Gamble investing just 1.3% of its overall media spend in paid-for internet ads, Nestle 2.7%, Unilever 1.9% and Tesco 1.4%.
Now, let’s just remind ourselves, these are 4 of the most sophisticated and innovative marketing brands globally and they’re consistently underspending in digital. And the main rationale for this is lack of measurable of results in terms of sales created. Or as Jerry Lloyd-Williams, head of content at MediaCom Beyond Advertising suggests:
For a lot of FMCG [CPG in the US] brands, one question still prevails, which is: do the dollars and pounds they spend on digital equate to sales? There’s still a lot of research that needs to be done, but the caution with which they are spending online is built on a reasonable research question.’
But let’s look at mobile, as opposed to PC-based advertising. Mobile can actually link advertising to a physical sale in a store. A brand can issue a mobile coupon and provided that the coupon can be digitally redeemed (as opposed to a sight-check by store staff), we can suddenly measure sales precisely and develop appropriate ROI formulations.
This isn’t a new concept, by any means. As an industry, we’ve been talking about “closing the loop” for the 11 years I’ve been in the industry and it’s remained the big promise of mobile marketing – but a promise that hasn’t yet been delivered. Most launches into this area rarely get beyond a trial as every method tried to date – from barcodes to NFC – require a significant upgrade in either the retailer’s EPoS or mobile handsets, or both. Such upgrades are expensive and take time to deploy.
When I was looking for my next role, I was looking for a market that had the ability to become a billion dollar business within 5 years. So it’s perhaps not surprising that mobile coupons would make my list. It’s potentially huge, with over 300 Billion paper coupons issued every year in the US alone. In addition, I know that mobile coupons will be embraced by retailers and FMCG/CPG verticals when a secure abd foolproof redemption methodology is in place.
However, in the last 11 years, I hadn’t seen a technology that would actually deliver the promise today in a scalable way. Until I came across Eagle Eye Solutions, which owns a great piece of patented technology that has the potential to disrupt several industries all at once – retailer marketing, mobile marketing and couponing.
While most players in this market have focused on scanning technology of some form, Eagle Eye have very cleverly thought out-of-the-box. Their idea has been to partner with the companies who supply retailers with their Credit Card Terminals in-store, or what we call in the UK, Chip and PIN Terminals. By integrating with these companies, which are already linked to the retail EPoS, something very neat indeed can be achieved. This is how it works.
1. Consumer Requests a Coupon
The ways in which a consumer might learn about the availability of a coupon are many and varied. But essentially, they’ll be responding to an ad – whether via traditional media, such a radio or press, or perhaps more likely, via mobile advertising itself. If by mobile, they can click on an ad or link and get a coupon sent to their phone, usually via ubiquitous sms.
2. The Coupon
The coupon is actually a simple unique PIN programmed for one-off usage.
3. The Retail Experience
They visit the store, make their purchase and use the Chip and PIN machine to enter the PIN as part or full payment. All the evidence so far points to very positive consumer acceptance of this mechanic, as they’re used to entering numbers in this way.
4. The Marketing
If the promotion is being run by the retailer, they get real-time reporting and analysis on their campaign. Ditto, if it’s a brand running the campaign via the retailer.
5. The Security
One of the dirty little secrets of the coupon industry is fraud.
There are two types of coupon misuse in operation. Malredemption is trade fraud – for example, where a retailer cuts out and collects coupons and claims back the face value and trade handling allowance, without ever involving a consumer. Clearly, this is a problem mainly involved with independent shops, but it is and always will be an issue using paper-based systems and manual fulfilment and reconciliation.
Misredemption is a far wider problem and involves the consumer claiming the value of the coupon without having ever purchased the product. It’s pretty hard to quantify the size of this wasted marketing budgets. Occasionally, a company with a vested interest in minimising the problem commissions a survey which finds that most people claim not to do it. But as you’re asking them to ‘fess up to cheating, maybe that’s not a big surpise.
Anyway, digital redemption is secure as the discount isn’t given by the retail EPoS unless the product is purchased. Brand budget holders can wave goodbye to this perennial headache for good.
6. The Fulfilment
No waiting for fulfilment houses to count coupons and send cheques (checks) around the country. So, the Green implications are pretty impressive too – especially avoiding the printing and distribution of the vouchers themselves.
Of course, the really huge opportunity here is using all the data to the best effect, but I think that’s a post for another day.
The mobile coupon/voucher space is already a crowded one. But that’s great for Eagle Eye as there are loads of companies who need the technology that we can deliver. The Facebooks, Groupons, LivingSocials and any company involved in running mobile advertising campaigns will all benefit from partnering with us to deliver mobile couponing today. So, I hope others will quickly see what the opportunity is here.
When I joined AdMob 5 years ago, many people questioned just what the hell I was doing getting involved in a company that ran banner campaigns on mobile websites. Clearly, I don’t need to explain that any more. In the same way, many people have asked the same thing about mobile couponing – or at least been very underwhelmed at the news.
Believe me, this sector is going to be massive and is worth getting very excited about indeed as the mobile revolution continues. Whether or not Eagle Eye turns out to be a big winner is yet to be seen. But I’ve researched this market very carefully and really believe that it’s got a good shot at winning big.
So, will mobile couponing be a billion dollar business in 5 years? We’ll see. But it’s going to be fun finding out.
—–>Follow us on Twitter too: @russellbuckley and @caaarlo
Tags: eagle eye solutions, mobile coupons, mobile marketing, retail marketing
Great article about the power of mobile coupons. Albeit written by someone who head up a company that does them!
In fact, I’ve seen mobile coupons in use here in NZ for a while now, and well executed at that. Todd Wackrow of PocketVouchers (http://www.pocketvouchers.com) is the man to speak to about this.
You don’t need to look at how overseas companies are being successful with mobile vouchers, when local brands like Rebel Sports, Sanitarium and Liquorland to name a few are having successes in your back yard.
Not overly expensive to execute either, and integrates right with your existing POS terminal. Easy.
The following is the weekly guest series by Derek Johnson, Founder & CEO of SMS marketing software Tatango.
After Groupon announced their plans to go public earlier this month at a $30 billion valuation, they’ve been taking punches left and right in the media. Even TechCrunch, which has always had a soft-spot in their heart for Groupon, let guest Rocky Agrawal spend an entire week ripping the daily deals giant a new one with posts such as the following:
Why Daily Deals Are Becoming A Raw Deal Why I Want Google Offers And The Daily Deals Business To Die Why Groupon Is Poised For Collapse I’m guessing this wasn’t the type of coverage Groupon had in mind after their big announcement.
The majority of the criticism being hurled at the daily deals giant isn’t that the consumer is getting a bad deal (I don’t know anyone that doesn’t love getting 50% off), it’s that businesses offering the Groupon deal are the ones still in search of positive results. If you’re not familiar with the ideology behind why a businesses is sold on using Groupon, it’s very simple. A business will offer a steep discount through Groupon, usually 50% off, exposing that business to thousands of new customers, who in a perfect world become repeat customers of that business.
After pouring over all of the criticism over the last month, a quote in the Wall Street Journal from business owner Jennifer London, sums up why businesses feel they are getting the shaft when using Groupon.
“Most of the people who came are not from this neighborhood – I most likely won’t see them again.” - Jennifer London (Xoom Smoothie Shop)
Ms. London is right in her assumptions, Groupon says its research shows 78% of its customers never come back to a business after redeeming a Groupon. To verify the accuracy of this statement, Utpal Dholakia, professor of management at Rice University did his own research by surveying 324 businesses that offered deals from August 2009 to March 2011 from five daily deals services including Groupon, LivingSocial, OpenTable, BuyWithMe and TravelZoo. His results were similar to Groupon’s own results, but he also found that nearly 80% of daily deals users were first time customers. If we do some back of the napkin math with the survey results, and take a business that redeems a whopping 1,000 coupons — that business is only generating 160 new repeat customers (1,000 Groupons x 80% new customers x 20% repeat customers).
Groupon’s tagline on their website is the following:
“Learn how a one-day feature on Groupon can bring your business thousands of new customers.”
Business owners and the news media are starting to wise up though and they want to see this instead:
“Learn how a one-day feature on Groupon can bring your business thousands of new [ repeat ] customers.”
With nearly 80% of all daily deal users being first time customers, the only solution I see besides drastically changing Groupon’s business model is to increase the amount of repeat customers for businesses using the service. Why is the number for repeat customers so low? Groupon doesn’t share information like email addresses or phone numbers of the customers coming into a store to redeem a deal. Groupon also doesn’t provide businesses with the tools to capture customer information on their own, which would allow the businesses the ability to create loyalty programs and advertise to those customers in the future to encourage repeat business.
A recent HipCricket survey found that 57% of people would be interested in opting in to a brand’s SMS loyalty program. Again, a little back of the napkin math and that comes out to just over 450 customers (with the same example above) willing to join that business’s SMS loyalty program. Compare that to the mere 160 new repeat customers currently generated from a Groupon campaign, and it seems like a no-brainer why Groupon’s next acquisition will be an SMS loyalty program provider.
The best part, adding an SMS loyalty program is a win-win for everyone! The consumer now gets deals straight to their mobile phone from businesses they enjoy, the businesses using Groupon get more repeat customers, and Groupon is able to increase the amount of businesses interested in running a second Groupon, which currently sits at just 50%.
Some interesting ideas in here.
The thing that’s most interesting is the idea of setting up in house txt loyalty programmes. This is very simple to do.
** WARNING – Shameless plug ***
With the COMTXT messaging platform, it’s quit easy to set this up too. Build your list of loyal customers, and txt them a great deal every now and again. From only 9c a message, you know that’s got to be a cost effective way of getting existing customers back through the door.
Try yourself for FREE at: http://my.comtxt.co.nz
The biggest defeat on WWE Monday Night Raw this past week didn’t take place among combatants inside the squared circle. Instead, the big loser of the night was WWE’s plan to engage fans and viewers via the “power to the people” text voting campaign.
On Monday, fans were given the opportunity to serve as the WWE Raw General Manager. By texting their match preferences for the evening, WWE was hoping to give fans a democratic majority-rule opportunity to determine which superstars would wrestle one another. Fans were also provided the opportunity to determine match stipulations and rules.
As it turned out, however, technical glitches caused the voting results to be every bit as genuine as the sport of professional wrestling itself.
The WWE now admits that three match choices were affected by “faulty text voting tabulation.”
Per the established rules on Monday, WWE fans could select match stipulations and opponents by texting A, B or C to 46993 (GOWWE). But when the system overloaded (that can happen when you’re fielding 600,000 texts), all hopes for making the live three-hour program “interactive,” were dashed via incorrect voting results – results that actually made viewers and fans alike scratch their heads during the program before anyone knew of the errors.
Simply put, something seemed a bit off when matches were being made that very few fans seemed to have any interest in watching. And the ratings from Raw this past week reflect that reality.
Still, WWE is being lauded for acknowledging the error and promising to give WWE fans the matches they really wanted to see (as determined by a subsequent correct tabulation of votes) next week on WWE Monday Night Raw.
So this is both good and bad. It’s bad because, well they had a glitch, but hey, it’s proven that people are willing to engage using mobile.
Nothing like a flood of txts to get people believing!
An open letter to the FFA – from a Wellington Phoenix fan
February 23, 2010
Dear FFA,
I’m one of the 24,278 Phoenix fans who were at the Ring of Fire on Sunday to support the Wellington Phoenix.I’m sure I don’t need to point out to you that Wellington delivered the biggest crowd of the first week of your finals series. In fact, 24,278 was nearly 6,000 (31%) more than the 18,453 who attended in Melbourne and over 20,000 (500%) more than attended on the Gold Coast.In terms of revenue this means that me and my friends have just contributed approximately NZ$ 800,000 to the FFA’s coffers. After deducting your costs I’m sure you still made a very healthy profit. And you must be relieved that this game wasn’t held in Perth, whose stadium cannot even hold 24,000 fans!You must also be very relieved that the Newcastle Jets upset Gold Coast United which means that there will now be another play-off game in Wellington rather than at Clive Palmer’s House of Shattered Dreams (has the morality tale The Emperor’s New Clothes ever been more applicable than to this absolute shambles of a club?). I suspect you might have actually lost money on the Gold Coast game this weekend but don’t worry! I think you can reasonably expect another crowd of 25,000 or more in Wellington in two weeks time and another fat cheque for NZ$ 800,000 courtesy of me and my friends.Anyway, bearing in mind the NZ$ 1.6m we Phoenix fans are giving you, I was just wondering if now might be a good time for you to give us some overdue assurance about the FUTURE OF OUR BELOVED FOOTBALL CLUB?I understand the importance of the Asian Champions League and your desire to curry political favour in Asia, but surely your first priority is the long-term success of your premium product – the A-League – and developing quality A-League franchises that are based on a solid business model and that will be around for the long haul. After all, without a successful A-League the issue of the Asian Champions League becomes irrelevant.After just one week of the finals series surely the contrasting fortunes of the Wellington Phoenix and Gold Coast United, both on and off the field, are enough to show you the way forward. The Wellington Phoenix is a shining example of the kind of franchise that you need in the future. Gold Coast United is not. DO THE RIGHT THING AND SECURE OUR FUTURE NOW!Who knows?, if you were to make such a statement over the next two weeks you might even push attendance at our next home game up to a capacity 34,000 and make yourselves some more cash!All the best,terminator_x
I think I’m meant to be cooking dinner, but i think this counts as a good excuse not to
December 15, 2009
I think I’m meant to be cooking dinner, but i think this counts as a good excuse not to
GloPos Debuts New Non-GPS Mobile Location Solution
September 22, 2009
Location-based devices, applications and services are quickly becoming an integral part of mobile marketing as a whole. Adding a user’s location to the mix opens up numerous opportunities for marketers and brands to engage a user, but obtaining that location usually means utilizing GPS- a technology that’s still only found in a handful of devices.
Beyond GPS, many providers have utilized the cell networks to obtain user’s locations via “cell tower triangulation”- a process that’s been around as long as the cell networks themselves, but has never been utilized to its fullest potential because of accuracy issues.
A new company founded this year, dubbed GloPos, is aiming to expand on this process by introducing specific algorithms to significantly enhance the accuracy of finding a user’s location using nothing more than the cell network they’re connected to. Using this method means that anyone with a cell phone, whether it’s a high-end smartphone or a low-end “feature phone” can be located, and thus marketed to.
The self-learning algorithm developed by GloPos helps the calculation of an accurate position within a 1-40 meters range. This is possible even in locations where there are no W-LAN access points or where GPS cannot be used as in shopping malls, underground parking areas, airports, sports arenas and exhibition centers. GloPos technology works well in locations where only a cellular network is present.
The new technology doesn’t need extra battery life while operating, as cell information establishes connectivity already, unlike using W-LAN or GPS. Device usage is prolonged, thereby allowing battery power to be consumed for other advanced applications and for powering powerful processors.
The technology is still being perfected, but if it works as well as the company claims it does, it will revolutionize location-aware services and solutions in the future. Cell network location has been talked about for a long time, but no one could seem to crack the code on making it more accurate and therefore usable on a large scale. We’ll have to keep our eye on this one.
Print Publishers Leaping into Mobile, Says Survey : Mobile Marketing Watch
September 22, 2009
Survey Highlights
– More than 80 percent of newspaper and magazine respondents believe people will rely more heavily on mobile devices as a primary information source in the next three years.
– Nearly 70 percent of respondents agree that mobile is receiving more attention at their publication this year than last.
– Forty-four percent of respondents who track mobile’s impact on their Web site traffic said the devices increased visits by up to 10 percent today. Half believe mobile traffic to their Web sites will increase by five to 25 percent in the next two years.
– Among senior executive respondents, 56 percent said their publication has plans to develop a smartphone application in the next 24 months,
in addition to the 17 percent of respondents who already have an app in production.– Nearly a third believe that mobile will have a significant impact on their publication’s revenue in just three years.
Marketing and advertising has been an essential form of communication through which Consumer-focused enterprises educate and create awareness amongst their consumers. Traditionally, they had been using Print, Direct Mailers and Billboard displays until the dawn of Internet. The mass adoption of Internet and the Web 2.0 era resulted in these companies increasing the share of their Ad-spend on Online based Marketing & Advertising campaigns.
Today, mobile is the king! There is no other mass media like Mobile that has a ubiquitous presence amongst consumers. Consumer-focused enterprises have increased their focus on Mobile as a channel to reach out to their consumers through effective Marketing Campaigns. But Mobile Marketing still has not reached its tipping point due to various reasons.
Interesting little article.
How to monetize SMS alerts – Mobile Marketer – Columns
September 17, 2009
Mobile alerts reach me no matter where I am. They are free. They are sent in real time. Best of all, I can customize them exactly how I choose.
What a great quote. Really does sum up some of the power of txt alerts.
What if you got a txt alert from that really cool blog you’re following, or for parent, a txt alert if soccers been cancelled in the morning.
The key here is FREE. If it’s free for who you want to target, then the adoption will be so much higher.
And yes, all you content publishers.. there are ways to make the cost of doing those alerts cost neutral as well 
Would You Pay For Wall Street Journal Mobile? (or How Not To Encourage Mobile Internet Usage)
September 17, 2009
The mobile WSJ content will be free no more, or at least it won’t be in a few months when the new subscription model takes effect. If you already have a subscription to the paper, you will have to pay $1 per week for that content. Nonsubscribers will be charged $2 per week.
